Article: PDF
DOI: 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-03-02
Abstract: The article deals with the problem of correlation between the poetic text and the video footage in modern video poetry. Despite the fact that this topic has already been touched upon in one way or another by researchers of the new direction in media art, not all issues have been resolved. Examples from the archive of the Fifth Leg video poetry festival (organized by E. Troepolskaya and A. Rodionov) are used for discussion in this article. The study considers the following types of video poetry: a video record of the author's reading; a video illustration or video clip based on a poem; a footage presented as a new interpretation, or as a “secondary” text, created on the basis of the “primary” one; a video production which initially, at the stage of planning already, combines poetic and visual components. Modern video poetry at a new stage in cultural history continues the idea of Gesamtkunstwerk, which inspired romantics (Goethe, Byron, Wagner) and symbolists, as well as the verbal-visual experiments of avant-garde artists. In contrast to the art of romanticism and “high” modernism, video poetry is democratic and in the form of its online existence it opposes the art market and enjoys a certain freedom of self-expression. In general, video poetry can be considered one of the new reading practices that are attractive to the generation of visuals. At the same time, video poetry faces difficulties due to the differences between the languages of the verbal and visual forms of art. The verbal characteristic does not pretend to be understood literally, and the visual “subtitles” only simplify the content of the poem. The language of poetry is metaphorical; therefore, the footing should be highly semiotic. The solution to the problem of the embodiment of the lyrical subject is also difficult: expressed in the text, as a rule, by a pronoun, the lyrical subject can hardly be visually substituted for by a concrete character of the video footage. Finally, a special problem is associated with the relationship between the poetic rhythm and video editing. Variants of the solution of the above mentioned issues in the videos of R. Osminkin (the poem “Life Passes By”), O. Yagodin (the poem by Mandelstam “Cinematograph”), A. Tolkacheva (“Fragments of Disappearance”) are considered in this article. Concrete examples convince us that there should be a “gap” between the verbal and visual components in video poetry, and that a new meaning arises as a result of experiments precisely on the borderline between literature and cinema. The key methods for visualizing a poem include the dissimilarity of the subject of the lyric expression and the change of the cultural context.
Key words: Modern poetry; media poetry; video poetry; poets; poetic creative activity; poetic texts; poems; various kinds of visual poetry; reading practices; subject of video poetry.

Для цитирования:

Барковская, Н. В. Видеопоэзия: проблема субъекта и контекста / Н. В. Барковская // Philological Class. – 2021. – Vol. 26 ⋅ №3. – С. 21-33. DOI 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-03-02.

For citation

Barkovskaya, N. V. (2021). Video Poetry: the Problem of Subject and Context. In Philological Class. 2021. Vol. 26 ⋅ №3. P. 21-33. DOI 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-03-02.

About the author(s) :

Nina V. Barkovskaya

Ural State Pedagogical University (Ekaterinburg, Russia)



Altshuller, M. (2020). «Strekochet lenta, serdtse b’etsya»: «Velikii nemoi» v poezii Mandel’shtama i Simonova [“The Ribbon Chirps, the Heart Beats”: “The Great Mute” in the Poetry of Mandelstam and Simonov]. In Sait «Gor’kii». November, 20. URL: (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Artamonov, A. (2016). Stikhi vs video [Verses vs Video]. In Seans. December, 20. URL: articles/videopoetry2016/ (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Broytman, S. N. (2008). Poetika russkoi klassicheskoi i neklassicheskoi liriki [Poetics of Russian Classical and Non-classical Lyrics]. Moscow, RGGU.

Davydov, D. (2011). Videopoeziya kak fenomen i kak raznoobrazie praktik [Video Poetry as a Phenomenon and as a Variety of Practices]. In Videopoeziya. URL: (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Etkind, E. G. (2001). Proza o stihakh [Prose about Poetry]. Saint Petersburg, Znanie.

Galieva, Zh. (2006). Smotriteli stikhov, rezhissery poetov [Poet Watchers, Poets Directors]. In Oktyabr’. No. 11. URL: (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Golynko-Wolfson, D. (2012). Poeticheskiu fil’m: postanovka problemy i materialy dlya ekspertizy [Poetic Film: Problem Statement and Materials for Examination]. In Translit. No. 9. URL: http// (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Kartashov, A. Smotret’ i videt’ stikhi: sovremennaya videopoeziya glazami festivalya «Pyataya noga» [To Watch and See Poetry: Modern Video Poetry through the Eyes of the Fifth Leg Festival]. URL: articles/literature/5621-smotret-i-videt-stihi (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Kostyukov, L. (2006). Poeticheskii klip kak yavlenie literatury [Poetic Clip as a Phenomenon of Literature]. In Arion. No. 3. URL: (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Mandelstam, O. E. (1991). Izbrannoe [Selected Works] / compiled, foreword and commentary by P. M. Nerler. Moscow, Interprint.

Nikiforova, A. S. (2015). Ideya sinteza iskusstv v kul’ture nemetskogo romantizma (ot I. G. Gerdera do R. Vagnera) [The Idea of the Synthesis of Arts in the Culture of German Romanticism (from J. G. Herder to R. Wagner)]. In Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. No. 3, pp. 68–82.

Pinezhaninova, N. P. (2016). Aktualizatsiya prostranstva povsednevnosti kak forma interpretatsii v poeticheskom videoklipe K. Serebrennikova «Konets prekrasnoi epokhi» [Actualization of the Space of Everyday Life as a Form of Interpretation in K. Serebrennikov’s Poetic Video Clip “The End of a Beautiful Epoch”]. In Praktiki i interpretatsii: zhurnal filologicheskikh, obrazovatel’nykh i kul’turnykh issledovanii. Vol. 1. No. 4, pp. 185‒196.

Platt, K. M. F. (2017). Pozhar v golove: Pavel Arsen’ev, esteticheskaya avtonomiya i «Laboratoriya poeticheskogo aktsionizma» [Fire in the Head: Pavel Arseniev, Aesthetic Autonomy and the “Laboratory of Poetic Actionism”]. In Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. No. 145. URL: (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Sedykh, E. V. (2014). K probleme intermedial’nosti: zhivopisnoe v poeticheskom [On the Problem of Intermediacy: the Picturesque in the Poetic]. In Turysheva, O. N. (Ed.). Pavermanovskie chteniya. Literatura. Muzyka. Teatr: sb. nauch. tr. Issue 2. Ekaterinburg, Azhur, pp. 103–111.

Troepolskaya, E., Rodionov, A. (2012). Alkhimicheskii zhanr [Alchemy Genre]. In Oktyabr’. No. 3, pp. 150– 153. URL: (mode of access: 27.07.2021).

Yauss, H.-R. (1995). Istoriya literatury kak provokatsiya literaturovedeniya [Literary History as a Provocation of Literary Criticism]. In Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. No. 12, pp. 34–84.

Zenkin, S. (2018). Teoriya literatury. Problemy i rezul’taty [Literature Theory. Problems and Results]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

Zhitenev, A. A. (2010). Sovremennaya literatura v kontekste media: fenomen videopoezii [Contemporary Literature in the Context of Media: the Phenomenon of Video Poetry]. In Goncharova-Grabovskaya, S. Ya. (Ed.). Russkaya i belorusskaya literatury na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov: sb. nauch. statei, in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Minsk, RIVSh, pp. 78–83.