Article: PDF
Abstract: The article presents a comparative analysis of Andrey Platonov’s play “Noah’s Ark (Cain’s Spawn)” and Alan Moore’s graphic novel “Watchmen”. The focus is on the common features in the depiction of the causes and forms of the apocalypse, which is the event core of the plots of both works. The first stage of the research covers the mechanism of “alternative history”, which takes place both in “Watchmen” and in Platonov’s play. Introducing real historical figures and events into the plot, the writers declare the situation of the approaching end of the world caused by the Cold War. The second stage is devoted to the conceptual triad “personal individualism – national exclusivity – conviction in God’s election”. The characters of the play and the graphic novel are endowed with saliently individualistic personal traits. At the same time, the characters are related to specific states (or nations). The egoism of each character conveys the conviction of a particular country in its own exclusivity and God-chosen nature. Platonov and Moore see the impossibility of humanity, represented by “exceptional” people, to conduct a constructive dialogue. As a result, the world is portrayed by the authors as noisy and chaotic. The significance of global cacophony in the context of the apocalyptic writers is also considered by the author at one of the stages of the work. The intertext analysis makes it possible to highlight not only the historical foundations for the similarity of the description of the apocalypse in the play and the graphic novel, but also the fundamental difference in its understanding by the Soviet writer and the British author. The years separating Platonov and Moore, life circumstances, as well as their belonging to different cultures (Soviet and British) set the grounds for a deepest divergence in the interpretation of the image of the human future, which is obviously embedded in the ideological layers of both texts. This point is considered by the author at the final stage of the study. The research is based on the achievements of the Platonov studies specialists who previously devoted their works to the author’s last play (N. M. Malygina, N. V. Kornienko, I. V. Kukulin, etc.), as well as on materials that offer an explanation of the social basis of mass science fiction literature of the 20th century (works by U. Eco, M. Dipaolo, etc.).
Key words: literature of the 20th century; Andrey Platonov; the play “Noah’s Ark (Cain’s Spawn)”; Alan Moore "Watchmen"; Cold War; apocalypse

Для цитирования:

Долгов, А. А. Рукотворный апокалипсис в пьесе «Ноев ковчег. Каиново отродье» А. Платонова и «Хранителях» А. Мура / А. А. Долгов // Philological Class. – 2023. – Vol. 28 ⋅ №3. – С. 202-213.

For citation

Dolgov, A. A. (2023). The Man-Made Apocalypse in the Play by A. Platonov “Noah’s Ark (Cain’s Spawn)” and A. Moore’s Graphic Novel “Watchmen”. In Philological Class. 2023. Vol. 28 ⋅ №3. P. 202-213.

About the author(s) :

Anton A. Dolgov

Ural State Pedagogical University (Ekaterinburg, Russia)

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9125-4344

 

The research was carried out with financial support of the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 23-28-00905 “Aesthetic meanings and fractal poetics of modern Russian literature: A. P. Platonov, L. M. Leonov, A. V. Ivanov”).

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 04.09.2023; date of publication: 31.10.2023.

References:

Chernyak, V. D., Chernyak, M. A. (2015). Massovaya literatura v ponyatiyakh i terminakh [Mass Literature in Concepts and Terms]. 2nd edition. Moscow, Flinta. 192 p.

DiPaolo, M. (2014). War, Politics and Superheroes: Ethics and Propaganda in Comics and Film. McFarland Incorporated Publishers. 330 p.

Eco, U. (2007). Rol’ chitatelya: issledovaniya po semiotike teksta [The Role of the Reader: Studies on the Semiotics of the Text]. Saint Petersburg, Symposium, Moscow, Izdatel’stvo RGGU. 502 p.

Eco, U. (2018). Superman dlya mass: Ritorika i ideologiya narodnogo romana [Superman for the Masses: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Folk Novel]. Moscow, Slovo. 248 p.

Gyunter. G. (2011). Po obe storony ot utopii. Konteksty tvorchestva A. Platonova [On Both Sides of Utopia: Contexts of Andrei Platonov’s Works]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 208 p. 

Khriashcheva, N. P., Kogut, K. S. (2015). Poetika tainopisi v p’ese A. Platonova «Uchenik Litseya» [The Poetics of Cryptography in A. Platonov’s Play “The Lyceum Student”]. In Voprosy literatury. No. 6, pp. 95–119.

Kornienko, N. (2006). Primechaniya [Notes]. In Platonov, A. P. Noev kovcheg: P’esy. Moscow, Vagrius, pp. 426–429.

Malygina, N. (1999). Povoroty amerikanskogo syuzheta Andreya Platonova: Neizvestnyi istochnik p’esy A. Platonova «Noev kovcheg» [Twists and Turns of the American Plot of Andrei Platonov: An Unknown Source of Platonov’s Play Noah’s Ark]. In Oktyabr’. No. 6, pp. 168–175.

Matveeva, N. V., Khriashcheva, N. P. (2009). Situatsiya priezda inostrantsev v p’esakh A. Platonova: «Sharmanka», «14 Krasnykh Izbushek», «Noev kovcheg (Kainovo otrod’e)» [The Situation of the Arrival of Foreigners in A. Platonov’s Plays: “Hurdy-Gurdy”, “14 Red Huts”, “Noah’s Ark (Cain’s Spawn)”]. In Russkaya literatura v XX veke: imena, problemy, kul’turnyi dialog. No. 10, pp. 139–162.

Moore, A. (2014). Khraniteli [Watchmen]. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus. 528 p.

Parkin, L. (2019). Alan Mur. Magiya slova [Alan Moore. Magic of the Word]. Moscow, Eksmo. 608 p.

Platonov, A. (1991). Tekhnicheskii roman [Technical Novel]. Moscow, Zhurnal «Ogonek». 48 p.

Platonov, A. P. (2006). Noev kovcheg: P’esy [Noah’s Ark: Plays]. Moscow, Vagrius. 464 p.