Journal archive

Abstract: Narrative gapping is one of the debated issues in contemporary narratology. This is evidenced by the recent work (2023) of G. Prince and W. Schmid: the first author complements his own classification of gaps already including “disnarrated” and “alternarrated” types with new types of narration – “undernarrated” and “overnarrated” ones. The second scholar suggests focusing on the “nonnarrated” – that which is not presented in the narrative, but is relevant to the story being told. The study of narrative gaps is especially urgent in relation to the modern forms of narration which have not received due scholarly attention yet. Among them is a forking-path narrative presented in the novel “4321” by P. Auster (2017). This narrative can be regarded as an example of “overnarration” (in the terminology of Prince): it tells the reader not about one life of the character, but about four lives at once. Each new “life” of the character in the novel is a separate storyline that comes into conflict (from the point of view of unfolding events) with other “lives” (in one life the character dies, in another he is still alive, etc.). At the same time, at the level of the reader’s perception, such “autonomy” of each storyline is not preserved: interacting with all of them, the reader inevitably correlates these lines with each other, and the events presented in them inevitably (in his imagination) overlap one another. How do narrative gaps function in this kind of narration? And what effect do they produce? The more storylines narrative produces, the wider the gaps zone expands: thus, the reader’s growing knowledge about the character is followed by an increasing, limiting their abilities “ignorance”. Moreover, as long as each line, in spite of being “autonomous”, still tells the reader about one and the same character, the appearance of new events in each subsequent line inevitably has the effect of filling gaps in the previous line. Narrative gapping on the level of the plot and on the level of the reader’s perception in such a narrative differs: on the level of the plot, the gaps remain “permanent” (in Schmid’s terminology), and on the level of the reader’s perception – “temporary”. The novel of Auster, as an exam- ple of a forking-path narrative, only metareflexively intensifies this narrative specificity: several chapters conclude with the narrator’s indication of gaps that will not be filled in the oncoming chapters of this storyline. Thanks to these cues, the reader’s attention focuses on these gaps, and their “temporary” nature becomes ever more salient while correlating various storylines.

About the author(s) :

Dina V. Shulyatyeva
HSE University (Moscow, Russia)
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-7395

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 08.02.2024; date of publication: 31.03.2024

References:

Brütsch, M. (2012). When the Past Lies Ahead and the Future Lags Behind: Backward Narration in Film, Televi- sion and Literature. In Eckel, J. (Dis)Orienting Media and Narrative Mazes. Bielefeld, Transcript Cultural and Media Studies, pp. 293–312.
Cameron, A. (2008). Modular Narratives in Contemporary Cinema. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Dannenberg, H. P. (2014). Gerald Prince and the Fascination of What Doesn’t Happen. In Narrative. No. 22(3), pp. 304–311.
Dillon, S. (2011). Chaotic Narrative: Complexity, Causality, Time, and Autopoiesis in David Mitchell's Ghostwrit- ten. In Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction. Vol. 52:2, pp. 135–162.
Eckel, J., Leiendecker, B., Olek, D., Piepiorka, C. (2012). (Dis)Orienting Media and Narrative Mazes. Bielefeld, Tran- script Verlag.
Frank, W. (2020). «Alternarré», «dénarré», «disnarré» : réflexions à partir d’exemples contemporains. In Cahiers de Narratologie. Accesed. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/narratologie/10641 (mode of access: 28.01.2024).
Genette, G. (1998). Figury: v 2 t. [Figures, in 2 vols.]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo Sabashnikovykh.
Gerrig, R. (2010). Readers’ Experiences of Narrative Gaps. In Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies. Vol. 2, pp. 19–37.
Herman, D., Jahn, M., Ryan, M.-L. (2005). Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Routledge.
Iser, W. (2004). Protsess chteniya: fenomenologicheskii podkhod [The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Ap- proach]. In Kabanova, I. V. Sovremennaya literaturnaya teoriya. Antologiya. Moscow.
Mcfarlane, A. (2022). Hypertext Fiction and Network Narratives. In O’Donnell, P., Burn, S. J., Larkin, L. (Eds.).
The Encyclopedia of Contemporary American Fiction 1980–2020. Blackwell Publishing.
Prince, G. (1988). The Disnarrated. In Style. Vol. 22. No. 1, pp. 1–8.
Prince, G. (1992). Narrative as Theme. Studies in French Fiction. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press. Prince, G. (2023). The Undernarrated and the Overnarrated. In Style. Vol. 57(2), pp. 131–140.
Richardson, B. (2001). Denarration in Fiction: Erasing the Story in Beckett and Others. In Narrative. Vol. 9. No. 2,
pp. 168–175.
Richardson, B. (2019). A Poetics of Plot for the Twenty-first Century: Theorizing Unruly Narratives. Ohio State University Press.
Richardson, B. (2023). Toward a Poetics of Multiversion Narratives. In Fabula. Narrative Versions and Virtualities.
Impossible Fictions. URL: https://www.fabula.org/colloques/document11181.php (mode of access: 28.01.2024).
Schmid, W. (2003). Narratologiya [Narratology]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury. Schmid, W. (2023). The Nonnarrated. Berlin, Boston, De Gruyter.
Sternberg, M. (1985). The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of Reading. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Warhol, R. R. (2005). Neonarrative; or, How to Render the Unnarratable in Realist Fiction and Contemporary Film. In Phelan, J., Rabinowitz, P. J. (Eds.). A Companion to Narrative Theory. Blackwell Publishing.
Willemsen, S., Kiss, M. (2020). Keeping Track of Time: The Role of Spatial and Embodied Cognition in the Com- prehension of Nonlinear Storyworlds. In Style. Vol. 54(2), pp. 172–198.