Journal archive

Abstract: The study focuses on the manifestation of the main literary trends – postmodernism and post-postmodernism – in the novels of the contemporary American writer J. Franzen, which has determined the purpose of the paper – to identify, characterize and analyze the leading features of the new literary tendencies that have obtained original interpretation in the writer’s literary creative activity. The article gives a brief overview of phi- losophical, cultural and literary criticism studies of both home and foreign scholars, which describe the vectors of development of the literary process at the present stage, pose various hypotheses with reference to the definition of these vectors, characterize them and suggest new terms for their nomination. The postmodernist and post-postmodernist tendencies are explored on the concrete material of the novels The Corrections and Purity by J. Franzen, in which they receive original interpretation and serve the purpose of impersonating the author’s ideas, unfolding the main themes, creating the characters and expressing the narration modality. The key method of research used in this paper is the method of interpretive analysis, which involves identifying content and semantic dominants and interpreting a work of fiction within a certain literary context, determining the inclusion of this work in the system of current literary movements and trends. The interpretive analysis of the works under investigation revealed various tendencies typical for the literary process of the post-postmodern era on the whole, the most important of which are the following: no clear distinction between postmodernism and post-postmo- dernism; realization and sophisticated interaction of elements of such new trends as metamodernism, cosmo- dernism, digimodernism, and automodernism. The results of the study can be used in literary analysis of modern fiction, and specifically in research works of different levels and in teaching at philological faculties of universities. The study argues that the novels by J. Franzen demonstrate the specific features of postmodernism and post-postmodernism, which reject the postmodernist principles and at the same time follow them, return to the realistic traditions and actualize new literary tendencies.

About the author(s) :

Lushnikova G. I.

V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University (Simferopol, Russia); ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-3184

Osadchaya T. Yu .

V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University (Simferopol, Russia) ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-2529

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 10.02.2021; date of publication: 30.06.2021.

References:

Afanasov, N. B. (2019). Obrazy sovremennosti v XXI veke: kosmodernizm [Images of Modernity in the 21st Century: Cosmodernism]. In Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. No. 2, pp. 46–62.
Bourriaud, N. (2009). Altermodernism. London, Tate Publishing. 224 p.
Burn, S. J. (2011). Jonathan Franzen at the End of Postmodernism. London, Continuum. 176 p.
Eshelman, R. (2008). Performatism or The End of Postmodernism. Aurora, The Davies Group Publishers. 288 p.
Franzen, J. (2002a). Mr. Difficult: William Gaddis and the Problem of Hard-to-Read Books. In Franzen, J. How to Be Alone. New York, Picador, pp. 238–269.
Franzen, J. (2002b). The Corrections. New York, Picador. 576 p.
Franzen, J. (2015). Purity. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 576 p.
Gruzdeva, E. A. (2017). Izobrazhenie globalizatsii sovremennoi kul’tury v romane Dzhonatana Franzena «Bezgreshnost’» («Purity») [The Representation of Modern Culture Globalization in Jonathan Franzen’s novel “Purity”]. In Vestnik
Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv. No. 3. pp. 44–47.
Hosseini, S. M., Pirnajmuddin, H., Abbasi, P. (2018). Jonathan Franzen’s The Corrections: Ethics of Complexity.
In Gema Online. Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 18 (4), pp. 186–200.
Kirby, A. (2009). Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture. London, Continuum. 288 p.
Koblenkova, D. V. (2015). «Teratologicheskii» roman K. Yu. Val’grena «Yasnovidets» v epokhu (post)postmodernizma [“Teratological Novel by C. J. Vallgren “Clairvoyant” in the Era of (Post) postmodernism]. In Novyi filologicheskii vestnik. No. 2 (33), pp. 148–156.
Kurtz, P. (2000). Gumanizm i skeptitsizm – paradigmy kul’tury tret’ego tysyacheletiya [Skepticism and Humanism. The New Paradigm]. In Zdravyi smysl. No. 17. URL: http://humanism.al.ru/ru/magazine.phtml?issue=2000.17-01 (mode of access: 07.02.2021).
Lipovetsky, G. (2005). Hypermodern Times. Cambridge, Polity Press. 90 p.
Lipsky, E. B. (2012). Post-postmodern: kontseptualizatsiya idei sovremennogo iskusstva [Post-postmodern: Conceptualization of the Idea of Modern Arts]. In Vestnik SPbGU. Filosofiya, kul’turologiya, politologiya, pravo. Ser. 6. Issue 2, pp. 42–48.
Lushnikova, G. I., Osadchaia, T. Yu. (2018). Sovremennaya angloiazychnaya literatura: traditsii i eksperiment [Modern English-speaking Literature: Traditions and Experiment]. Moscow, INFRA-M. 170 p.
Lushnikova, G. I., Osadchaia, T. Yu. (2020). Kontaminatsiya zhanrovykh form v romane Dzh. Franzena «Bezgreshnost’» [Contamination of Genre Features in the Novel “Purity” by J. Franzen]. In Filologiya i chelovek. No. 3. pp. 98–110.
Mazorenko, D. A. (2019). Avtomodernizm posle postmoderna. Kak vygliadit «Sotsial’noe» v tsifrovuyu epokhu? [Auto-modernism after Postmodernism. What Does ‘Social’ Look Like in the Digital Age]. In Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. No. 2, pp. 202–224.
Moraru, Ch. (2010). Cosmodernism: American Narrative, Late Globalization, and the New Cultural Imaginary. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press. 440 p.
Morozov, A. V. (2019). Ostorozhno, metamodern: sovremennost’ kak zontik i mayatnik [Look Out! This is Metamodern: Modernity as an Umbrella and a Pendulum]. In Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. No. 3. pp. 238–249.
Mozheiko, M. A. (2016). Sovremennye sotsiokul’turnye transformatsii i filosofiya post-postmodernizma: noveishie tendentsii [Modern Social and Cultural Transformations and Philosophy of Post-Postmodernism: New Tendencies]. In Filosofskie nauki. No. 7. pp. 80–95.
Nealon, J. (2012). Post-Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism. Redwood City, Stanford University Press. 241 p.
Pavlov, A. V. (2018a). Obrazy sovremennosti v XXI veke: didzhimodernizm: retsenziia na knigu Alana Kirbi [Images of Modernity in the Twenty-first Century: Digimodernism. A Review of Alan Kirby’s Book]. In Filosofiya. Zhurnal vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. Vol. 2. No. 2, pp. 197–212.

Pavlov, A. V. (2018b). Obrazy sovremennosti v XXI veke: metamodernizm [Images of Modernity in the Twenty-first  Century: Metamodernism]. In Logos. Vol. 28. No. 6 (127), pp. 1–19.
Pavlov, A. V. (2019a). Obrazy sovremennosti v XXI veke: gipermodernizm [Images of Modernity in the Twenty-first Century: Hypermodernism]. In Filosofskii zhurnal. Vol. 12. No. 2, pp. 20–33.

Pavlov, A. V. (2019b). Obrazy sovremennosti v XXI veke: sverkhmodernizm [Images of Modernity in the Twenty-first
Century: Supermodernism]. In Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. No. 1. pp. 69–83.
Pavlov, A. V. (2019c). Filosofiya kul’tury v post-postmodernizme [Philosophy of Culture in Post-postmodernism: A Critical Analysis]. Dis. … d-ra filos. nauk. Moscow. 447 p.
Pogodina, O. A. (2012). Kontseptsiya post-postmodernistskoi kul’turnoi paradigmy v sotsial’noi filosofii Pola Kurtsa
[Post-postmodernist Cultural Paradigm in Paul Kurtz’s Social Philosophy]. In Diskussiya. No. 1 (19), pp. 27–32.
Proskurnin, B. M. (2010). Realizm? Modernizm? Postmodernizm? Post-postmodernizm? Razmyshleniya o sovremennoi britanskoi proze [Realism? Modernism? Postmodernism? Post-postmodernism? On Contemporary British Fiction]. In Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. No. 6 (12), pp. 209–214.
Rudrum, D., Stavris, N. (Eds.). (2015). Supplanting the Postmodern: An Anthology of Writings on the Arts and Culture of the Early 21st Century. New York, Bloomsbury Academic. 400 p.
Safonov, E. E. (2019). Chto budet vmesto postmoderna? Dizhdimodernizm kak kul’turnaya dominanta [What Will Happen instead of Postmodern? Digimodernism as a Cultural Dominant]. In Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. No. 1, pp. 178–195.
Serbinskaya, V. A. (2017). Postmodernizm i metamodernizm: razgranichenie ponyatii i cherty metamodernizma v sovremennoi literature [Postmodernism and Metamodernism: Concepts Differentiation, and Metamodern Features in Modern Fiction]. In Paradigma. No. 26, pp. 22–30.
Sharpe, J. (2018). Economies of Reputation: Jonathan Franzen’s Purity and Practices of Disclosure in the Information Age. In Open Library of Humanities. No. 4 (1): 22, pp. 1–23.
Tormakhova, A. N. (2016). Iskusstvo v teoriyakh post-postmodernizma [Art in the Theories of Post-postmodernism]. In Studia Culturae. No. 1 (27), pp. 18–26.
Van den Akker, R. (2020). Metamodernizm. Istorichnost’, Affekt i Glubina posle postmodernizma [Metamodernism. Historicity, Affect, and Depth After Postmodernism] . Moscow, RIPOL klassik. 470 p.
Van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A., Vermeulen, T. (Eds.). (2017). Metamodernism. Historicity, Affect, and Depth After Postmodernism (Radical Cultural Studies). London, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 260 p.