Article: PDF
DOI: 10.51762/1FK-2022-27-01-20
Abstract: The article examines the theoretical prerequisites (the ideas of K. Marx and F. Engels), the sources (pre-March literature of the 19th century, working-class literature at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries) and the early development (1920s – 1930s) of socialist realism in Germany. It was at that time that the need to put literature at the service of party and class interests was declared. The main problems of the works correspond to the spirit of party propaganda and popularization of social-democratic ideas. In the history of the formation of Marxist aesthetics as the foundation for socialist literature, a great role belongs to F. Mering, who justified one of the basic differences between socialist literature and other socio-critical literary trends, which only depicted social conflicts, but did not connected their resolution with the ideas of class struggle and proletarian revolution. Among the initiators of socialist realism in Germany (1920–1930-ies) were I. R. Becher, B. Brecht, F. Wolf, A. Zegers, etc. They were well acquainted with Soviet literary policy and practice (M. Gorky and others) and transferred it to German soil. The main postulates of the literature of that period were: a socialist work should strive for the knowledge of truly dialectical objectivity and take pains to provide a comprehensive, concrete and profound demonstration of the unity of the driving forces of history. The famous Marxist philosopher G. Lukács made a great impact on theory and practice of German socialist realism. His ideas that the creators of socialist art and the artistic “ideological avant-garde” are called upon to discover the typical and show new trends in the development of essential features of modern life following the best traditions of European realism, as well as the idea of the popular art understood in the spirit of Marxist-Leninist aesthetics, were actively followed by German proletarian writers in the Weimar Republic and anti-fascist writers during the Third Reich.
Key words: Working-class literature; socialist literature; Marxist-Leninist aesthetics; socialist realism; ideological avant-garde; German literature; German writers; literary creative activity; literary genres.

Для цитирования:

Кудрявцева, Т. В. К истокам социалистического реализма в Германии / Т. В. Кудрявцева // Philological Class. – 2022. – Vol. 27 ⋅ №1. – С. 194-206. DOI 10.51762/1FK-2022-27-01-20.

For citation

Kudryavtseva, T. V. (2022). About the Origins of Socialist Realism in Germany. In Philological Class. 2022. Vol. 27 ⋅ №1. P. 194-206. DOI 10.51762/1FK-2022-27-01-20.

About the author(s) :

Tamara V. Kudryavtseva

M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia)

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8279-8639

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 01.12.2021; date of publication: 30.03.2022.

References:

Andreiushkina, T. N. (2018). Iogannes Robert Bekher [Johannes Robert Becher]. In Istoriya literatury Germanii XX veka: v 2 t. Vol. 1. Kniga vtoraya. Literatura Germanii mezhdu 1918 i 1945 godami. Moscow, IMLI RAN, pp. 379-393.

Arato, A., Breines, P. (1979). The Young Lukács and the Origins of Western Marxism. N. Y., Pluto Press. 256 p. 

Baumgart, H. (1978). Vorwort. In Und immer brennt unser Herz.: Anthologie zum 50. Jahrestag der Gründung des Bundes proletarisch-revolutionärer Schriftsteller. Hrsg. von H. Baumgart. Berlin, Verlag Tribüne. 191 p.  

Becher, J. R. (1929). Unsere Front. In Die Linkskurve. No. 1, pp. 1-3.

Benjamin, W. (1934). Zum gesellschaftlichen Standort des Schriftstellers. In Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung. Vol. 3. Issue 1, pp. 54-78.

Benjamin, W. (1982). Der Autor als Produzent. Aufsätze zur Literatur. Ansprache im Institut zum Studium des Fascismus in Paris am 27. April 1934. In Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. II. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, pp. 683-701. 

Benjamin, W. (1982). Karl Kraus. In Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. II. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, pp. 334-367. 

Biha, O. (1930). Der proletarische Massenroman. Eine-Mark-Serie des Internationalen Arbeiterverlages.

In Die Rote Fahne. 02.08.1930, pp. 404-406.

Brecht, B. (1954). Weite und Vielfalt der realistischen Schreibweise. In Brecht B. Versuche. Berlin, Suhrkamp. H. 13, pp. 97-107.

Brecht, B. (1973). Theorie der Pädagogien. In Brecht B. Gesammelte Werke: In 20 Bdn. Bd. 17. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, pp. 1022-1023.

Brecht, B. (2001). Handbuch: Bd. 2. Gedichte. Stuttgart; Weimar, J. B. Metzler. 510 p. 

Burns, R. (1977). Theory and organization of revolutionary working-class literature in the Weimar Republic. In Culture and Society in the Weimar Republic. Hrsg. v. K. Bullivant. Manchester, University Press, pp. 122-149.

Dobryashkina, A. V. (2018). Literatura v izgnanii [Literature in Exile]. In Istoriya literatury Germanii XX veka: v 2 t. Vol. 1. Kniga vtoraya. Literatura Germanii mezhdu 1918 i 1945 godami. Moscow, IMLI RAN, pp. 835-864.

Gatov, A. (Ed.). (1930). Revolyutsionnaya poehziya Zapada XIX veka [The West Revolutionary Poetry of the 19th Century]. Moscow, Aktsionernoe izdatel’stvo «Ogonek». 42 p.  

Gor’ky, M. (1928). O proletarskom pisatele. Pis’mo litkruzhkovtsam proftekhnicheskoi shkoly goroda Pokrovska [About the Proletarian Writer. Letter to the Literary Circle Members of the Professional Technical School in the City of Pokrovsk]. In Pravda. 24.04.1928. 

Grünberg, K. (1955). Wie ich zu «tausend Zungen» kam. In Hammer und Feder. Deutsche Schriftsteller aus ihrem leben und Schaffen. Berlin, Verlag Tribüne, pp. 114-137.

Klein, A. (1974). Zur Entwicklung der sozialistischen Literatur in Deutschland 1918–1933. In Literatur der Arbeiterklasse. Aufsätze über die Herausbildung der deutschen sozialistischen Literatur (1918–1933). Berlin, Aufbau-Verlag, pp. 17-117.

Krämer, W.-D. (2016). Archäologie der Arbeiterliteratur – Rückgriff für die Zukunft des Werkkreis Literatur der Arbeiterwelt. In Von der Arbeiterkultur zur Kultur der Arbeiter. Das kulturelle Erbe der Arbeiterbewegung und politische Kulturarbeit heute. Hrsg. von H. Kolbe, D. Burggraf, P. Straβer. Celle, Books on Demand, pp. 69-82.

Lukach, G. (1936). Intellektual’nyi oblik literaturnogo geroya [Intellectual Appearance of a Literary Hero]. In Literaturnyi kritik. No. 3, pp. 1-66.

Lukach, G. (1938). K istorii realizma [About the History of Realism]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo khudozhestvennoi literatury. 371 p. 

Lukach, G. (1938). Spor idet o realizme [The Dispute is Going about Realism] / transl. by N. Vol’kenau. In Internatsional’naya literatura. No. 12, pp. 172-189.

Lukach, G. (2003). Istoriya i klassovoe soznanie. Issledovaniya po marksistskoi dialektike [History and Class Consciousness. Studies on Marxist Dialectics] / transl. by S. Zemlyanoi. Moscow, Logos-Al’tera. 416 p.  

Lukács, G. (1911). Bürgerlichkeit und l'art pour l'art: Theodor Storm. In Lukács G. Die Seele und die Formen. Essays. Berlin, Fleischel, pp. 121-122.

Lukács, G. (1916). Die Theorie des Romans. Ein geschichtsphilosophischer Versuch über die Formen der großen Epik. In Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft. H. 3, pp. 225-271.

Lukács, G. (1923). Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein. Studien über marxistische Dialektik. Berlin, Malik. 341 p. 

Lukács, G. (1932). Tendenz oder Parteilichkeit. In Die Linkskurve. H. 6, pp. 13-21.

Lukács, G. (1954). Franz Mehring (1846–1919). In Lukács G. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Ästhetik. Berlin, Aufbau-Verlag, pp. 318-403.

Lukács, G. (1961). Zur Soziologie des modernen Dramas (1911). In Lukacs G. Schriften zur Literatursoziologie. Neuwied, Luchterhand Verlag, pp. 261-295. 

Lukács, G. (1997). Ästhetische Kultur In Jahrbuch der internationalen Georg-Lukacs-Gesellschaft. Bern, Peter Lang, pp. 13-26. 

Marks, K., Engel’s, F. (1983). Ob iskusstve: v 2 t. [About Arts]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Iskusstvo. 700 p. 

Mehring, F. (1961). Gesammelte Schriften: In 15 Bdn. Bd. 11. Aufsätze zur deutschen Literatur von Hebbel bis Schweichel. Berlin, Dietz. 627 p. 

Peitsch, H. (2001). Engagement / Tendenz / Parteilichkeit. In Ästhetische Grundbegriffe: In 7 Bdn. Bd. 2. 

Dekadent – Grotesk. Hrsg. von K. Barck u.a. Stuttgart, Weimar, Metzler, pp. 178-223. 

Plakhina, A. V. (2016). Rabochaya literatura [Worker’s Literature]. In Istoriya literatury Germanii XX veka: v 2 t. Vol. 1 (1880–1945). Kniga pervaya. Literatura Germanii mezhdu 1880 i 1918 godami. Moscow, IMLI RAN, pp. 410-429.

Potseluev, S. (2017). Vspominaya Lukacha [Remembering Lukacs]. In Lukach D. Istoriya i klassovoe soznanie. Khvostizm i dialektika. Tezisy Blyuma (fragment) / transl. by S. P. Potseluev. Moscow, Russkii fond sodeistviya obrazovaniyu i nauke, pp. 5-51.

Ritzer, M. (2007). Georg Simmel (1858–1918). Der Begriff und die Tragödie der Kultur (1911). In KulturPoetik.

Bd. 7. H. 2, pp. 259-270.

Shumakher, E. (1988). Zhizn’ Brekhta = Leben Brechts [Brecht’s Life]. Moscow, Raduga. 350 p.  

Simmel, G. (1911/1912). Der Begriff und die Tragödie der Kultur. In Logos – Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie der Kultur. Bd. II. Tübingen, Mohr, pp. 1-25. 

Strel’nikova, A. A. (2018). Osobennosti literaturnogo protsessa v Veimarskoi respublike [Features of the Literary Process in the Weimar Republic]. In Istoriya literatury Germanii XX veka: v 2 t. Vol. 1. Kniga vtoraya. Literatura Germanii mezhdu 1918 i 1945 godami. Moscow, IMLI RAN, pp. 9-16.

Strel’nikova, A. A. (2018). Proletarsko-revolyutsionnaya literatura [Proletarian-Revolutionary Literature]. In Istoriya literatury Germanii XX veka: v 2 t. Vol. 1. Kniga vtoraya. Literatura Germanii mezhdu 1918 i 1945 godami. Moscow, IMLI RAN, pp. 355-378. 

Tallafuss, P. (2007). «Literatur als Waffe» –Literarischer Aktivismus im «Bund proletarisch-revolutionärer Schriftsteller» und im «Kampfbund für deutsche Kultur». In Totalitarismus und Literatur. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 55-76.

Timofeev, L. I., Turaev, S. V. (1972). Sotsialisticheskii realizm [Socialist Realism]. In Surkov, A. A. (Ed.).

Kratkaya literaturnaya ehntsiklopediya: v 9 t. Vol. 7. Moscow, Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya, pp. 92-101.

Weber, M. (1964). Werk und Person. Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). 720 p. 

Weber, M. (1988). Politik als Beruf. In Weber M. Gesammelte politische Schriften. Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), pp. 505-561. 

Wunberg, G. (1971). Die literarische Moderne: Dokumente zum Selbstverständnis der Literatur um die Jahrhundertwende. Frankfurt a. M. 302 p.

Yakusheva, G. V. (2018). Lion Feuchtwanger [Lion Feuchtwanger]. In Istoriya literatury Germanii XX veka: v 2 t. Vol. 1. Kniga vtoraya. Literatura Germanii mezhdu 1918 i 1945 godami. Moscow, IMLI RAN, pp. 211-239.

Zemlyanoi, S. (2003). Istoriya, soznanie, dialektika. Filosofsko-politicheskaya mysl’ molodogo Lukacha v kontekstakh XX veka [History, Consciousness, Dialectics. Philosophical and Political Thought of Young Lukacs in the Contexts of the XXI Century]. In Lukach G. Istoriya i klassovoe soznanie. Issledovaniya po marksistskoi dialektike / transl. by S. Zemlyanoi. Moscow, Logos-Al’tera, pp. 7-69.

Zemlyanoi, S. (2004). Chelovecheskii proekt Bertol’ta Brekhta [Bertolt Brecht’s Human Project]. In Brekht B. Meti. Kniga peremen. Sobranie izbrannykh sochinenii. Vol. I. Proza / transl. by S. N. Zemlyanoi. Moscow, LogosAl’tera, pp. 19-38.

Zemlyanoi, S. (2006). Dukhovnye iskaniya molodogo Lukacha [The Spiritual Searches of Young Lukach]. In Logos. No. 1 (52), pp. 109-115.