Article: PDF
DOI: 10.26170/2071-2405-2025-30-1-148-155
Abstract: The article shows the essential role of drama in the work of the 20th century greatest English poet Ted Hughes. Being mainly a myth-maker and a language experimenter, Hughes throughout his life turned to drama as a genre capable of showing the work of a myth, which the poet found in almost any classical text and implicitly embedded in his own poetry collections. The article shows how, by translating and adapting the texts of ancient tragedies for the modern English stage, Hughes focused on the polyphony of myth, the multiplicity of its interpretation, pagan symbolism, and not on the classical conventions of form and language. The author also describes in detail the meaning and structure of Hughes’ literary essay “Shakespeare and the Goddess of Complete Being” (1992), in which Hughes’ Shakespeare appears as a poet-prophet who “solved” the ancient mythical code. As for Hughes’ own works related to theatrical activities and drama, the author of the article analyzes the experimental play “Orghast”, written and directed by Hughes together with the English director Peter Brook. The author describes how the plots of various world myths intertwine and function in the play “Orghast”. The last part of the article examines how Hughes implements the dramatic principle in his own poetry collections, thereby giving them polyphony and new semantics. The article also touches on the specifics of dramatic monologues, a special poetic form, where the Hughes myth comes to life, acquires a special sound and expression in the voice of the mythical characters.
Key words: drama; dramatism; theatre experiments; drama adaptation; mythic narrative; monomyth; persona poetry; dramatic monologue; poetry of masks

Для цитирования:

Гурьянова, А. А. «Мифическая субстанция» драмы Т. Хьюза / А. А. Гурьянова. – Текст : непосредственный // Philological Class. – 2025. – Vol. 30 • No. 1. – С. 148-155. DOI 10.26170/2071-2405-2025-30-1-148-155.

For citation

Gurianova, A. A. (2025). “Mythic Substance” of T. Hughes’ Drama. In Philological Class. 2025. Vol. 30 • No. 1. P. 148-155. DOI 10.26170/2071-2405-2025-30-1-148-155.

About the author(s) :

Antonina A. Gurianova

National Research University Higher School of Economics (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia)

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-9253

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 23.06.2024; date of publication: 28.03.2025

References:

Bakhtin, M. M. (1994). Avtor i geroi v esteticheskoi deyatel'nosti [Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity]. In Bakhtin, M. M. Raboty 20-kh godov. Kiev, Next, pp. 23–217.

Butler, R. Ted Hughes: 1930–1998: Ted Hughes and the Stage. In Dramatic works by Ted Hughes. Introductions to some of Hughes’s dramatic writings from a range of writers and scholars. URL: https://thetedhughessociety.org/drama (mode of access: 12.05.2024).

Eliade, M. (1999). Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya [Essays on Comparative Religion]. Moscow, Ladomir, pp. 33–37.

Fleming, K. (2013). “For Everybody Must Answer the Sphinx”: Ted Hughes’s Translation of Seneca’s Oedipus. In Canadian Review of Comparative Literature / Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée.

Gifford, T., Roberts, N. (1981). Ted Hughes: A Critical Study. London, Faber and Faber.

Gorguin, I. (1971). Fifth Festival of Arts, Shiraz-Persepolis. Tehran, Public Relations Bureau of the Festival of Arts, Shiraz-Persepolis.

Helfer, R., Loney, G. M. (1998). Peter Brook: Oxford to Orghast (Contemporary Theatre Studies). Harwood Academic Publishers.

Hirschberg, S. (1981). Myth in the Poetry of Ted Hughes: A Guide to the Poems. Totowa, New Jersey, Barnes and Noble Books. 239 p.

Hughes, T. (1978). ‘The Critical Forum’ Series. Norwich Tapes Ltd.

Hughes, T. (1992). ‘Your World’. In The Observer Magazine. 29 November, pp. 23–39.

Hughes, T. (1993a). ‘Foreword’ in Sacred Earth Dramas. London, Faber.

Hughes, T. (1993b). Shakespeare and the Goddess of Complete Being. London, Faber and Faber Ltd. 524 p.

Hughes, T. (1995). Winter Pollen. New York, Picador USA. 480 p.

Hughes, T. (1998). Seneca’s Oedipus. London, Faber andamp, Faber Plays.

Hughes, T. (2003). Collected Poems. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 1333 p.

Hughes, T. (2007). Letters of Ted Hughes. London, Faber and Faber Ltd., 756 p.

Moulin, J. (1996). Krogon & Moa: Ted Hughes’s Philosophical Approach to Logos. In Second Conference of the Hellenic Association for the Study of English, Athens (Greece), Mar. 1996. Athènes.

Orghast: Interview with Ted Hughes by Peter Wilson. 5th Festival of Arts. Shiraz Persepolis. (1971). In Tamasha Daily Bulletin. Week. Aug.[sic] Sept. 1st.

Parsons, M. (1994). Touch Monkeys: Nonsense Strategies for Reading Twentieth-Century Poetry. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

Pratt, T. (2009). Seneca’s Drama. University of North Carolina Press, Enduring Editions. 240 p.

Sagar, K. (2000). The Laughter of Foxes. A Study of Ted Hughes. Liverpool, Liverpool univ. press. 196 p.

Sagar, K. (2005). Literature and Crime against Nature. From Homer to Hughes. London, Chaucer Press.

Scigaj, L. M. (1992). Critical Essays on Ted Hughes. New York, G. K. Hall and Co.

Scott-Kilvert, I. (1968). Seneca or Scenario. In Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics. Vol. 7. No. 3, pp. 501–511.

Skea, A. Adam and the Sacred Nine: A Cabbalistic Drama. URL: https://ann.skea.com/AdamHome.html (mode of access: 19.06.2022).

Skorodenko, V. A. (1976). Predislovie [Preface]. In Iz sovremennoi angliiskoi poezii. Robert Greivz, Dilan Tomas, Ted Kh'yuz, Filipp Larkin. Moscow, Progress, pp. 5–6.

Smith, A. C. H. (1973). Orghast at Persepolis. Viking Press.

Supple, T. Ted Hughes and the Theatre. URL: https://ann.skea.com/TimSupple.html (mode of access: 12.05.2024).

Wedekind, F. Spring Awakening: A new version by Ted Hughes was first performed by the Royal Shakespeare Company at The Pit in the Barbican on 2 August 1995. Director: Tim Supple. URL: https://ann.skea.com/Persepolis%20Orghast%
20interview.html (mode of access: 12.05. 2024).