Article: PDF
DOI: 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-03-08
Abstract: The article is devoted to the category of deictic mode and its role in modeling the strategy of text interpretation. The importance of the problem statement is associated with the specifics of the material under study. Fragmentation, discontinuity of spatial-temporal relations, alternation of points of view, nonlinearity of the organization of B. Pasternak’s 1910–1920 prose complicate the process of adequate interpretation of the text, which requires the reader to concentrate attention and go back several times to check the relevance of understanding. In this regard, the techniques that focus the reader’s attention, acquire special significance in the process of interpreting a modernist cento text. The aim of the study is to reveal the system of linguistic means that help focus the reader’s attention, direct it in the process of interacting with the text, and form a strategy for interpretation. The use of the descriptive method, the method of continuous sampling, contextual analysis and the interpretive method made it possible to identify the system of linguistic means, their functional specifics, and the system of deictic relations that activate the reader’s attention by turning on certain cognitive mechanisms. These are both linguistic means and methods of personal deixis (the system of personal pronouns), and means of dialogization (discursive elements), and ungrammatical remarks, and spatial coordinates reflecting the process of the narrator’s gaze movement from object to object. Together, they form a grid of deictic coordinates, each of which should attract the reader’s attention and determine their movement from one point of reference to another. By participating in the organization of the strategies of perception and interpretation of the text by the reader. The identified system of linguistic means and the principles of their interaction, used by Pasternak in early prose, may in future become one of the most regular ways of modeling the deictic mode of the text, which determines the strategy of its interpretation by the reader and reflecting the peculiarities of his idiostyle.
Key words: Text interpretation; fiction texts; deictic mode; discursive elements; cento texts; literary discourse; Russian writers; literary creative activity; literary genres; early prose.

Для цитирования:

Соловьева, С. А. Дейктический модус и его роль в моделировании стратегии интерпретации текста / С. А. Соловьева // Philological Class. – 2021. – Vol. 26 ⋅ №3. – С. 88-100. DOI 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-03-08.

For citation

Soloveva, S. A. (2021). The Deictic Mode And Its Role in Modeling the Strategy of Text Interpretation. In Philological Class. 2021. Vol. 26 ⋅ №3. P. 88-100. DOI 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-03-08.

About the author(s) :

Svetlana A. Soloveva

Cherepovets State University (Cherepovets, Russia)

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7688-2108

References:

Akhapkin, D. N. (2012). Kognitivnaya poetika i problema deiksisa v khudozhestvennom tekste [Cognitive Poetics and the Problem of Deixis in Literary Text]. In Kognitivnye issledovaniya: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Saint Petersburg, рр. 252–263.

Akhapkin, D. N. (2019) Bistabil’nye teksty: o kognitivnykh mekhanizmakh podderzhaniya nerazreshimoi mnogoznachnosti [Bistable Texts: on the Cognitive Mechanisms of Maintaining Insoluble Ambiguity]. In Kritika i semiotika. No. 4. URL: doi.org/10.25205/2307-1737-2019-2-136-145 (mode of access: 12.28.2020).

Bakhtin, M. M. (2000). Avtor i geroi: K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk [Author and Hero: To the Philosophical Foundations of the Humanities]. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka. 336 p.

Bever, T. G. (1970). The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures. In Hayes, J. R. (Ed.). Cognition and the Development of Language. New York, Wiley.

Bogin, G. I. (2001). Obretenie sposobnosti ponimat’. Vvedenie v filologicheskuyu germenevtiku [Gaining the Ability to Understand. Introduction to Philological Hermeneutics]. Tver. 52 p.

Bulygina, T. V., Shmelev, A. D. (1997). Yazykovaya kontseptualizatsiya mira (na materiale russkoi grammatiki) [Linguistic Conceptualization of the World (Based on the Material of Russian Grammar)]. Moscow. 576 p.

Byuler, K. (1993). Teoriya yazyka. Reprezentativnaya funktsiya yazyka [Theory of Language. Representative Function of Language]. Moscow. 528 p.

Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A., Hewitt, L. E. (1995). Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dymarsky, M. Ya. (1998). Tekst – diskurs – khudozhestvennyi tekst [Text – Discourse – Literary Text]. In Tekst kak ob"ekt mnogoaspektnogo issledovaniya: sbornik statei nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara «Textus». Ssint Petersburg, Stavropol.

Dymarsky, M. Ya. (1999). Problemy tekstoobrazovaniya i khudozhestvennyi tekst [Problems of Text Formation and Literary Text]. Saint Petersburg. 284 p.

Eco, W. (2005). Rol’ chitatelya: issledovaniya po semiotike teksta [Role of the Reader: Research on Text Semiotics]. Saint Petersburg, Symposium. 502 p.

Fateeva, N. A. (2010). Sintez tselogo. Na puti k novoi poetike [Synthesis of the Whole. Towards a New Poetics]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 352 p.

Gadamer, G. G. (1988). Istina i metod [Truth and Method]. Moscow. 699 p.

Gasparov, B. M. (1996). Yazyk. Pamyat’. Obraz. Lingvistika yazykovogo sushchestvovaniya [Language. Memory. Form. Linguistics of Linguistic Existence]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 276 p.

Genette, G. (1998). Figury [Figures], in 2 vols. Vol. 1–2. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo im. Sabashnikovykh. 944 p.

Il’enko, S. G. (1994). Stilisticheskie i sintaksicheskie aspekty dialogichnosti [Stylistic and Syntactic Aspects of Dialog]. In Issledovaniya po khudozhestvennomu tekstu. Part 1. Saratov.

Khimenok, V. I. (2016). Montazh, literaturnye i muzykal’nye priemy v proze B. L. Pasternaka (na primere povesti «Vozdushnye puti») [Editing, Literary and MUSICAL TECHNIQUES in the Prose of B. L. Pasternak (on the Example of the Story “Air Ways”)]. In Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. No. 11 (65), in 3 parts. Part 3, pp. 36–54.

Kravchenko, A. V. (2013). Nekotorye soobrazheniya o soznanii i yazyke: gomunkulus kognitivnogo internalizma [Some Considerations about Consciousness and Language: the Homunculus of Cognitive Internalism]. In Aktual’nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. Vladikavkaz, pp. 39–46.

Kubryakova, E. S. (Ed.). (1997). Kratkii slovar’ kognitivnykh terminov [Brief Dictionary of Cognitive Terms]. Moscow. 245 p.

Kuzmina, N. A. (1999). Intertekst i ego rol’ v protsessakh evolyutsii poeticheskogo yazyka [Intertext and Its Role in the Evolution of Poetic Language]. Avtoref. Dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. Ekaterinburg. 38 p.

Lotman Yu. M. (2000). Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta [The Structure of Artistic Text]. Saint Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb, pp. 14–288.

Lotman, Yu. M. (1996). Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov: Chelovek – Tekst – Semiosfera – Istoriya [Inside the Thinking Worlds: Man – Text – Semiosphere – History]. Moscow. 464 p.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge, NY, Cambridge Univ. Press. 897 p.

Mart’yanova, I. A. (2011). Kinematograf russkogo teksta [Cinematography of Russian Text]. Saint Petersburg, Svoe izdatel’stvo. 239 p.

Pasternak, B. (1991). Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], in 5 vols. Vol. 4. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatua.

Segal, E. M. (2002). Narrative Comprehension and the Role of Deictic Shift Theory. In Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A. and Hewitt, L. E. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science perspective. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 3–17.

Smirnov, I. P. (2012). Porozhdenie interteksta (Elementy intertekstual’nogo analiza s primerami iz tvorchestva Pasternaka) [Generation of Intertext (Elements of Intertextual Analysis with Examples from the Works of Pasternak)]. Saint Petersburg. 450 p.

Srebryanskaya, N. A. (2005). Deiksis i ego proektsii v khudozhestvennom tekste [Deixis and His Projections in a Literary Text]. Voronezh, VGPU. 255 p.

Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London, New York, Routledge Tsur, R. (2003). Deixis and Abstractions: Adventures in Space and Time. In Gavins, J., Steen, G. (Eds.). Cognitive poetics in practice. London, Routledge, pp. 41–54.

van Dijk, T. A., Kinch, V. (1988). Strategii ponimaniya svyaznogo teksta. [Strategies for Understanding a Coherent Text]. In Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Moscow, Progress.

Yakobson, R. (1987). Zametki o proze poeta Pasternaka. Raboty po poetike [Notes on the Prose of the Poet Pasternak. Works on Poetics]. Moscow, Progress. 464 p.

Zholkovsky, A. K. (2011). Poetika Pasternaka. Invarianty, struktury, interteksty [Poetics of Pasternak. Invariants, Structures, Intertexts]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 608 p.

Zolyan, S. T. (2014). Semantika i struktura poeticheskogo teksta [Semantics and Structure of Poetic Text]. Erevan. 336 p.